![]() ![]() Am Nat 124:255–279Ĭarvalho WD, Mustin K, Farneda FZ et al (2021) Taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic bat diversity decrease. Plos One 8:e57786īrown JH (1984) On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Neotrop Entomol 45:490–498īraga RF, Korasaki V, Andresen E, Louzada J (2013) Dung beetle community and functions along a habitat-disturbance gradient in the Amazon: a rapid assessment of ecological functions associated to biodiversity. Plant Anim Interact 144:72–79īourg A, Escobar F, MacGregor-Fors I, Moreno CE (2016) Got dung? Resource selection by dung beetles in Neotropical forest fragments and cattle pastures. Ibis 146:114–124īoulay R, Fedriani JM, Manzaneda AJ, Cerdá X (2005) Indirect effects of alternative food resources in an ant–plant interaction. J Insect Sci 14:299īorges SH (2004) Species poor but distinct: bird assemblages in white sand vegetation in Jaú National Park, Brazilian Amazon. Conserv Physiol 5:1–18īogoni JA, Hernández MIM (2014) Attractiveness of native mammal’s feces of different trophic guilds to dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae). Ecol Indic 43:154–161īirnie-Gauvin K, Peiman KS, Raubenheimer D, Cooke SJ (2017) Nutritional physiology and ecology of wildlife in a changing world. Ecol Indic 95:418–526īicknell JE, Phelps SP, Davies RG, Mann DJ, Struebig MJ, Davies ZG (2014) Dung beetles as indicators for rapid impact assessments: evaluating best forestry practice forestry in the Neotropics. Rev Colomb Entomol 36:285–291īeiroz W, Sayer E, Slade EM, Audino L, Braga RF, Louzada J, Barlow J (2018) Spatial and temporal shifts in functional and taxonomic diversity of dung beetle in a human-modified tropical forest landscape. Biometrics 62:245–253īarraza JM, Montes JF, Martínez NH, Deloya C (2010) Assemblage of coprophagous beetles (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) of Tropical Dry Forest in Bahia Concha, Santa Marta (Colombia). 64:439–445Īnderson MJ (2006) Distance based tests for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions. Int J Primatol 16:611–627Īlm U, Birgersson B, Leimar O (2002) The effect of food quality and relative abundance on food choice in fallow deer. Stud Neotrop Fauna E 24:201–211Īgetsuma N (1996) Dietary Selection by Yakushima Macaques ( Macaca fuscata yakui): The Influence of Food Availability and Temperature. Biotropica 48:7–23Īdis J, Ribeiro EF, Morais JW, Cavalcante ETS (1989) Vertical distribution and abundance of arthropods from white sand soil of a Neotropical Campinarana forest during the dry season. Therefore, we conclude that diet of dung beetles that dwells in Campinaranas are relatively strict, with species being attracted mostly to carrion or feces, regardless of the availability of other food types.Īdeney JM, Christensen ML, Vicentini A, Cohn-Haft M (2016) White-sand ecosystems in Amazonia. Seven out of nine species were attracted towards one of the resource types, regardless of the trap spacing design. In terms of assemblage parameters, although food type did not affect species richness or individual abundance in both trap-spacing approaches, the species composition of beetles collected in carrion-baited traps was distinct from that in feces-baited traps. lentum were considered specialists of human feces, no species was considered generalist. Overall, we captured 76 dung beetles of nine species, where Deltochilum septemstriatum Paulian (1938), was classified as a specialist of carrion, Sylvicanthon proseni (Martínez, 1949) and Canthidium gr. Closely spaced sets of pitfall traps (5 m of distance between traps) baited with different food types were installed to test food preference, and widely-spaced traps (150 m of distance) baited with different food types to test food-type attractivity. The aim of this study was to assess the attractiveness and preference of different food types (dung, carrion, and banana) for dung beetles from a region of Amazonian white-sand vegetation (Campinarana). Dung beetle species feed from a wide range of food resources, including feces, carrion, and rotten fruit. Trophic niche and resource availability are among the most important drivers involved in the coexistence of species, which may require specific resources or exploit a large variety of resources. The recognition and use of food resources in animal species may vary according to availability. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |